Skip to main content

Technologies

Ship AI features that pass evals — not demos

Most AI projects look great in a notebook and break in production. We build LLM and ML systems with evals from day one, guardrails before launch, and observability after — so the thing you demo is the thing your customers use.

What We Build

Production AI systems, not Jupyter notebooks

LLM Integration

Wire GPT, Claude, Gemini, or open-source models (Llama, Mistral) into your product with streaming, tool use, and structured outputs.

RAG Systems

Retrieval-augmented generation over your private data. Vector DBs (Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector), reranking, and hybrid search that actually retrieves the right thing.

Agentic Workflows

Multi-step agents with tool use, planning, and state. Built on MCP, LangGraph, or custom orchestration — with circuit breakers and human-in-the-loop.

Evals & Guardrails

Automated evaluation suites, hallucination detection, PII redaction, prompt injection defense. You ship on evidence, not vibes.

Fine-Tuning & Distillation

LoRA fine-tuning for domain accuracy. Distillation to cut latency and cost. Bring your own data or we curate it.

Predictive ML

Classical ML where it still wins: forecasting, churn, fraud, anomaly detection. Built on scikit-learn, XGBoost, or PyTorch — not an LLM hammer for every nail.

How We Work

Eval-first, guardrails-before-launch. The opposite of 'demo, then panic.'

01

Define the eval

Before writing a line of code, we agree on what 'good' means: accuracy targets, latency SLOs, cost ceilings, refusal policy. No eval, no project.

02

Data audit

Inspect retrieval corpus, labeling quality, distribution drift. Most LLM features fail because the data is wrong, not the model.

03

Build the first version

Pick the cheapest model that could plausibly work. Wire it up end-to-end. Resist premature fine-tuning.

04

Run the eval

Score against the rubric defined in step 1. Find the failure modes. Iterate on prompt, retrieval, chunking, then model.

05

Add guardrails

Prompt injection defense, PII redaction, output validation, rate limits, cost caps. Ship the safety layer before launch, not after the incident.

06

Ship + monitor

Production observability for token usage, latency, eval drift, user feedback. Retrain or swap models when the data tells you to.

Where We Start

The shipping-shaped engagements teams ask us for most

AI Chat & Copilot Features

Embed a domain-aware chat or copilot into your existing product. Streamed responses, tool use, citation, and feedback loops.

Internal Knowledge Search

RAG over your wiki, docs, tickets, contracts, or codebase. Authenticated, audited, and tuned for your team's vocabulary.

Document Intelligence

Structured extraction from PDFs, scans, and emails. Forms, invoices, KYC, contracts — with confidence scores and human review queues.

Custom Fine-Tuned Models

Open-source models fine-tuned on your data for domain accuracy, latency, or cost wins versus frontier APIs.

Computer Vision

Defect detection, OCR, quality control, identity verification. Edge or cloud inference depending on latency budget.

Predictive Analytics

Forecasting, churn, fraud, lead scoring, demand planning. Classical ML where it outperforms LLMs on accuracy and cost.

Common Questions

Frontier API (OpenAI/Claude/Gemini) or open-source (Llama/Mistral)?
Default to frontier API for speed-to-value; switch to open-source only when one of three things bites: cost at scale, data residency, or domain accuracy where fine-tuning frontier models is hard or impossible. We help quantify the break-even point before committing.
What's a good eval?
Concrete examples with expected outputs, scored either by rules (exact match, regex, JSON validation) or by a trusted human/LLM judge with a published rubric. Bad evals score 'helpfulness' on a 5-point scale. Good evals fail the build when accuracy drops below 92%.
How do you handle hallucinations?
RAG (so the model has the right context), structured outputs (so it can't make up fields), guardrails (output validation, refusal policies), and citations (so users can verify). And we set a refusal floor — the model should say 'I don't know' rather than guess.
Do you fine-tune?
Only when prompt engineering and RAG run out of room. Fine-tuning is the right answer for domain vocabulary, style, or cost reduction via distillation — not for adding knowledge (use RAG).
What about cost?
Token budgets per request, caching (semantic and prompt), model routing (cheap model for easy queries, premium for hard), and Active CPU pricing where applicable. Production AI features typically settle in the ₹50–₹500/1000-request range with optimization.

Domains we've shipped in

B2B SaaSHealthcareLegalFintechE-commerceEdTech

Have an AI feature stuck at the demo stage?

We do the evals, retrieval tuning, and guardrail work that turns prototypes into production.